Ideas & Suggested Improvements: Improved Finances

October 23rd, 2007 by SM Dev (ste)

Improvements in relation to ‘Improved Finances’ (which is listed in future improvements) is well underway and to date improvements have been made to wages, the transfer system, and prize money.

SM is still open to ideas from managers on what other areas in relation to finance they would like to see improved or introduced. If you would like to suggest any idea please try and post a detailed explanation on how it could be introduced and also what impact it would have (as well as any benefits). There is a thead on the SM Forum which will be monitored by the SM Devs.

Bookmark this:
Add 'Ideas & Suggested Improvements: Improved Finances' to Del.icio.us

Del.icio.us Add 'Ideas & Suggested Improvements: Improved Finances' to digg

digg

Add 'Ideas & Suggested Improvements: Improved Finances' to reddit

Facebook

Add 'Ideas & Suggested Improvements: Improved Finances' to Technorati

Technorati Add 'Ideas & Suggested Improvements: Improved Finances' to Stumble Upon

Stumble Upon

Posted in: Ideas & Suggested Improvements

Previous / Next Articles

86 Comments Add your own

1. Darren Hadley | December 1st, 2007 at 7:19 pm

I am carilse utd, i got promoted last season, and now i am struggling,in the league above i have a poor squad for that league and i am in dept,i could do with cash injection buy chairman ,too give me a chance of stayin up . there isnt much i can do otherwise, tried almost everything. Please sort a bigger stadiums out for smaller clubs like me. then this game will take some beating GREAT GAME .Thanks Daz
2. matthew | December 14th, 2007 at 6:25 pm

I think that clubs like man u and barce etc should all get the same balance cos teams like villareal cant buy some players cos bigger teams in the same league out bid them!!
3. matthew | December 14th, 2007 at 6:26 pm

I think also that in the english championships lower league teams should get more cash cos a good youngster cost 1mill+ and they only get about 5mil anyway, lok at morecombe, 6m and average rating of wat 74 how r they guynna compete with money like that??
4. caleb | December 16th, 2007 at 1:55 pm

um we can sack are chairman
5. Andrew | December 19th, 2007 at 11:39 pm

I think it would be a good idea if u could text a number and then SM send you back a code which you type into the main page and from there you should be able to put cash into what ever clubs you want.
6. wen wei | December 24th, 2007 at 7:04 am

i have an idea…..don’t know whether it is good or not…..
we can require some money from the chairman…..
and the chairman will send you the money depend on how you use the money…..
if you simply use the money…..the money you will receive is lesser…so on…..

for example, maybe 2 mil for 3 turns or something…
7. Darren Hadley | December 31st, 2007 at 12:40 am

Could do a youth cup, with prize money for winner, otherwise i dont see point in youth team, because they dont save you money in wages
8. Kurt | January 17th, 2008 at 7:40 pm

I agree wi Darren Hadley!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9. jake davis | January 21st, 2008 at 7:37 pm

i agree with darren hadley and wen wei
10. Danny Reed | January 22nd, 2008 at 4:04 pm

A youth cup would be a gud idea, but every team doesnt have 11 youth players. unless teams with 11 or more players cud register for the cup and only registerd teams compete.
11. john | January 22nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm

i think we could hire owners of clubs like roman i (cba to write full name) for chelsea . we could request more money from them…………………….HES LOADED lol
12. gaz | January 23rd, 2008 at 1:52 pm

i agree with the youth cup,so younger players get higher ratings eventualy
13. Jord | January 23rd, 2008 at 10:33 pm

we cud av for the youth thing a 5 a-side?
14. kim | January 24th, 2008 at 10:32 am

yeah.when you promoted i’ts difficault to stay in that league.cause the material you have to work with is just not good enough.and you also don’t have enough cash to invest in new players.
he big teams have money enough.so it’s easy for them to stay on highest level.i think that’s not fair.and something has to be done about that.

kim
15. Luke Wilton | January 26th, 2008 at 10:34 am

12. gaz | January 23rd, 2008 at 1:52 pm
i agree with the youth cup,so younger players get higher ratings eventualy
_____________________________________________________
This is not possible, they base it on real life form, not SM form.

- Also, i agree with the person who said about registering for the cup. IF you have 13+ youth players you can subscribe for A cup.

So is the point? ;
- 1) To bring in money for the team
- 2) More fun.

Yeah, just two points..

So how does it work? ;
- 1) Every match you get a bit of money, well, lets say 1m a match, we’ll let SM decide it.
-2) A manager IN the set up will create the cup.
– THIS IS MAINLY HOW THE CUP WORKS:

– The cup can vary from 8-16 clubs.
– You CAN NOT sell YOUTH players whilst your in a youth cup.
– 5 million for WINNING - 2.5 million for runner-up.
– YOUTH players do lose fitness per game.
________________________________________________
Thas my IDEA of the cup.

Hopefully SM do this.
16. Dan | February 10th, 2008 at 2:54 am

cash injections need to be more fair and realistic, as with the chairmen values on players, it difficult to get many quality players in with the current levels of cash injections. there isnt really any other major sources of revenue.

pehaps add a section where merchandising, stadium facilities can be dealt, such as training grounds and stadium expansion with which help attract players through like a club reputation level based on recent history, results and infrastructure etc
17. matt hizzy | February 10th, 2008 at 7:09 pm

I think youth cup is great idea….
My idea is that your owner/chairman should give u bonus money depending how good your team is performing (morale/chemistry).
For example: If you won 3 games in a row u could get sent a messege saying “Chairman is pleased with your teams performance and has given you £5M bonus money”. This would help managers who need money.
18. Daz Hadley | February 16th, 2008 at 10:43 pm

yeee think weve sort youth cup out there !
19. fyre fuze | February 18th, 2008 at 10:20 am

I guess giving managers the control fo gate receipts may also help. As in SM can allow managers to be able to change the gate receipts within a plus minus 25% range of a normal fixed value. So that when a managers anticipates a tough game, he may raise this value to get extra money. Also when the match is against low order team, one may decrease this value to attract more crowd.
20. gAv GaV | February 21st, 2008 at 6:57 pm

why not 3 or 4 times a season the chairman sends a message saying if you win tonights game you will get a few extra funds like in a BIG game like a derby or title decider/ relegation battle or just a team around you in the table.
21. kevin | February 21st, 2008 at 9:26 pm

ya this is true
i won div 2 in my setup wit dynamo kiev (coz im superman) nd i only got 10mill
What???
all that hard work for pocket change of a big club
22. Me! | February 22nd, 2008 at 10:53 am

Youth cup!youth cup! youth cup!

i think so long as teams have the option to enter it would work fine, cz then the issues of ‘wat about teams who dont have 11 youth players in the right posiitons’ would be an issue
23. mark hicks | February 22nd, 2008 at 9:23 pm

i all so think sm should do a youth cup to to make the game more realistic !! what do you all think ?
24. shane | February 23rd, 2008 at 7:01 pm

how about a youth system for all leagues , where the coach tells you about a youth player who you can bring in to 1st team.

if good enough you can keep him if not then sell to raise funds
25. Craig Mitchell | March 7th, 2008 at 5:57 pm

I also think we sud av a yuth cup cause dat wud make it a lot mor funner
26. Mitch | March 7th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

I agrees wif shane
27. Leonardo | March 8th, 2008 at 6:47 pm

Youth cup!youth cup! youth cup!

and i fink we should also earn more money from derbys. but i want the youth cup more!

Youth cup!youth cup! youth cup!
28. Neil Wilson | March 11th, 2008 at 4:15 pm

I think the money situation is about right, you cant expect lower league clubs to be given millions. What would be a good idea however is that if a club gets a new manager then usually in real life the chairman gives a cash boost to the new manager for players, this could be reflected in the game depending on the start the manager makes. I also think that a transfer window like in real life would be ideal, this will also help smaller clubs compete as they can build finances during a down period in transfers. At the minute as soon as people have money they spend it.
29. remus | March 13th, 2008 at 8:35 am

In the finance section , we could do with setting the price for the tickets , esspecialy when u have a derby , or cups u could raise a bit the ticket price for the game . that will be a good way to make some extra cash.
30. JC | March 13th, 2008 at 11:11 am

Hi all,

First I would like to thank the “squad” of SM, this is really going to be the best online manager game. I luv it.

I have some comments:
I am manager of Rangers and 1st in the league (2nd division) unbeaten, but with a lower rated players (to compare with other teams in my squad) but my manager’s average point is still lower than some others. Even in the 1st division there is no team that unbeaten. I hope you will review it. Thank you guys. I still luv the game…
31. richard | March 28th, 2008 at 11:48 am

i think we should be able to contact the board like you can on champ and ask for fund or be able to upgrade the stadium and training faciliteis…more realistic values on players by chairmen would be greatt.. ticket pricing would be good….we should get youth players coming to us every season just like real life….hope we can get some of these at least
32. jimmi | April 1st, 2008 at 7:47 pm

YoUtH cUp DEfInEtlY
AmaZiNg iDEA only being able to register if u have enogh players in youth squad to + cash bonus 4 winners & runners up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
33. mohammed ismail | April 1st, 2008 at 8:09 pm

youth cups plz plz do it coz i got loads of good youth players
34. SteveG. | April 2nd, 2008 at 3:30 pm

I agree with Darren Hadley! no.7
35. Massimo Donati | April 2nd, 2008 at 9:23 pm

i think all players in the game are over valued & this causes teams to need more money. if you look at a lot of players in the championship they cost a couple of million whereas in real life they would cost under £1m.
36. Ian.K | April 5th, 2008 at 3:50 pm

I think that both merchandise and sponsor need to be rethinked and the managers should play a bigger role in them e.g. Investing in more media exposure; paying 2.5million for a bonus of 500k per game - would take 5games to break even and from there on, profit.

Wages appear to be fine from my point of view, however with the top players they can be too much for the lower teams. This can only be solved with the new stadium building idea which opens the doors to more ticket sales, merchandising, sponsoring and overall growth.
37. Rhys Braldey | April 14th, 2008 at 8:43 pm

i think the youth cup should be based on internationals lke the under 21 international tournaments played in real life. however i dont think these should be managed and managers should have the chocie to send their players on international duty. i think this could help improve morale in youth players, playing for bigger clubs, that only get a few games a season (most probably cup games).
38. yosef | April 19th, 2008 at 6:32 pm

any form of a youth cup or league is a fantastic idea, which i wud luv to see introduced!!
39. dunny | April 20th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

i think we shud b able 2 ask the chariman for more money or to improve the stadiums, and the chairmans value of sum players is too high
we need mre if things are going to stay the same
40. Craig | April 23rd, 2008 at 4:40 pm

Youth cups good idea, but what about the players you don’t use? A reserve league in the same setup would be good
41. kenna | May 17th, 2008 at 11:09 am

this is a good idea i think my worst team is sunderland [that i suport in rl] i had it when it was in div 2 well it some times just unlucky to go up then stuggle but my sunderland didnt i have many 90’s now and my highest is a 95 great for sunderland but now im stuggling to pay all those wages of the 90’s i no sunderland has a big stadium [coz i live in sunderland and like i sai i support them lol] but i need some more money im starting to loose my places i usaly finished in div 1 about 5th or 4th now im 16th i need some way to get more money
42. Ziggy | May 22nd, 2008 at 6:35 pm

The youth cup is a great idea. It would make youth teams worth having and even if a bad club in a low division had a bad rated team, they could spend all their cash on a youth team in order to raise funds. Leagues wourld be a lot better if more teams bought youth players instead of every team buying old but high rated players.
43. darren mccartan | May 23rd, 2008 at 7:26 pm

im middlesbourgh i need more money jst give me it im in backrucy
44. Lordof QPR | May 24th, 2008 at 7:20 pm

I think clubs should be able to get money from bigger sponsors, possibly outside local business men etc. I also think that clubs should be able to give money to another club for free (but obviously not too much) if they are doing them a favour etc. Such as if Port Vale loaned a Man Utd youngster, Man Utd could pay them as a thankyou. This way smaller clubs could have a netter chance of survival
45. Amit Raina | May 31st, 2008 at 9:55 am

I think that managers should be able to talk directly to players if they have less 2 years left on their contract. And offer them more lucretive contrants so that they dont have to pay any transfer fee this would make it more fun and the transfer fess would not so inflated. Also teams that have players will learn to value them more it would make it realist and would make offering new contrants more fun.
46. Amit Raina | May 31st, 2008 at 10:11 am

I also think that if a player is sent on loan and and has low morale and has good or excellent morale after he finish the season with the culb he was loned to then the player may be albe to put in a transfer request where by he can be sold for half the chairmans value. This would be good way of stoping big teams stockplieing players.
Also if a player has low morale and is not loaned out he may put in a transfer request and becomes a free agent. This would also stop big clubs for stealing all the talent and not using it.
47. Andrei | June 2nd, 2008 at 2:37 pm

Do something about the god damned chairmen…I agreed terms for Gerrard (Terry plus Riquelme) and the god damned chairman blocked the deal…WTF ?!?!
48. Adam Kelly | June 2nd, 2008 at 4:36 pm

I belive a scenario where you could text to a number a get a code whch enables you to add more money to your football team. Or the possibility of recieving money for the player you loan out from the other club?
49. Joel Bassett | June 4th, 2008 at 10:41 am

I am a manager of two clubs; Fulham and Plymouth Argyle. I thought of a great idea for another way for clubs spend their money. I thought that you could put in a system that aloowed you to upgrade your stadium and buy more seating so that it allows you to have more income from gate tickets.
50. emre | June 9th, 2008 at 2:02 am

I think they should let us pick our sponsor and every time the team gets better we should be able to pick even better sponsors
51. Tshepo Shaft Mabala | June 9th, 2008 at 8:56 pm

Each team should get a provisional allowance from their real sponsors plus their chairmans.its honestly impossible to get a few decent players with 5 million.The big teams snatch them up with huge amounts of money!!!!!!!!!!!Frustrating really…
52. Mark Stuart | June 10th, 2008 at 9:11 am

I think the idea of being able to choose youre own sposors is a very good idea. You could also extend this to picking sponsorships for youre stadium etc. This would add something different to the game, and it would be a good way of getting more cash for youre team.

The youth cup idea is a very good one, as somebody said before whats the point of having a youth team otherwise?
53. RJ | June 10th, 2008 at 6:36 pm

i fink we should’nt have chairman value because some of the players cost way 2 much like 20 mill when they should cost the sm value like 10 mill
54. Daryn C | June 16th, 2008 at 2:48 am

How about bringing in a player who is a ‘man-marker’ specialist? A player could mark a specifc player and negate or hamper that players ability to have an effect on the game? Do it on a rating vs rating scenario??
55. Daryn C | June 16th, 2008 at 2:49 am

How bout we have a ‘man-marker’ specialist??
56. wilson | June 19th, 2008 at 9:05 am

We should create a youth cup and league and for the youth squads that have more than 16 youth players.And have sponsors for the teams.Or even let our clubs have owners(Example-Glazers of Man United & Thaksin for Man City)We could also draw in fans to increase our money and set ticket prices.
57. Ben Weaver | June 21st, 2008 at 5:50 pm

i agree with the idea of a youth cup. It doesnt have to be 11 - a - side, maybe 5,6, or 7 a side ? The young players in the Cup should have the same rules as the normal cups, (only play for one club in a cup per season).

Otherwise you waste money having a youth team.
58. Joe-Mo | June 26th, 2008 at 8:55 pm

hi
just a suggestion.

How About a manager/player of the month/year award, with cash prizes? And, the winning manager gets an increased reputation, and if you apply for a club, a little comment saying if the manager has won any awards.
Thanks, and i love the game!
59. matt draper | June 28th, 2008 at 3:52 pm

the youth cup seems a good idea but it was mentioned ages ago and nothing is really happening with it
60. yousaf | June 30th, 2008 at 12:20 am

I agree with managers having the choice of ticket prices to games. As soon as this comes in to effect, SM would be better than ever.
61. kieron blackstock | July 7th, 2008 at 9:10 am

i think that you should be able to ask your chairman to invest money for transfers. you should be able to go to your chairman and ask for transfer fees up to £50 million at the end/beginning of each season. you should also be able to ask your chairman for transfer fees in the middle of the season but only if you have an injury or a suspenion and you need someone to replace the player/players
62. jack reidy | July 7th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

we should be able to expand r stadiums. sm could put a price on how much it would cost for every thousand we expand by. and to stop stadiums expanding to much there should be a maxium capacity of 110,000.
63. Rien MacDonald | July 12th, 2008 at 1:33 am

The youth cup sounds like a great idea.
My idea is on the basis of sponsors. A page is set up with the sponsors of the site SM. Alongside the name or advertisement is a money amount of how much is available to you if you choose there sponsorship,
e.g. On the side of the page I am on now, the advertisement of Snuggle Bunny is up, or Jamster. On the sponsor page could have Jamster with a value of say 500k per turn..( The value of the sponsorship would increase/decrease varying on your league position) That point would enable even the smallest club in division 4 to rival Man United.

Here it is in point form…
1. A sponsor page with a selected amount of sponsors (changing throughout season in correspondance with clubs success).
2. Alongside the sponsors is a price value. Let’s say your are 5th on the ladder in division 4. You could select Jamster as your sponsor at 1million per turn. Then as your ladder position rises, you have the option of selecting a new and better sponsor in the hope of gaining more money per turn. (If your ladder position drops, so does the money amount per turn).

Its fairly simple and gives the advertises of the site further exposure. It would give any team a chance of being number 1 in their league and would show who the real managers are as buying power would be equaled from the begginning.
64. Sheepy5 | July 13th, 2008 at 6:22 pm

can’t we have money coming in from television deals
65. Alex Hurt | July 16th, 2008 at 6:45 am

i think the youth cup would be the best idea. it gives a chance for you to see your youth players game without risking a normal match. i think the prize money should be greater as you are bringing through the next gen.
66. jake | July 16th, 2008 at 6:26 pm

i think we should have more prize money to improve the clubs and transfe market
67. Lee | July 17th, 2008 at 9:06 am

iv just had a few managers bid for some of my players. there bids were around 50 million and 75 million. i was happy to sell them for that price but their chairman wouldnt accept the bid. can something be done about this?
if their willing to pay that money for my players let them.
68. Labram | July 24th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

I think that for transfers the player should have a say in where he goes, this would make the game more relistic.

At the moment teams like Bournemouth can sign anyone if they have the funds.
69. robert | July 26th, 2008 at 8:54 pm

i think players should be able to rejected clubs and managers should be able to sell players for under the chirmans value, it would be good if there was ratings from the chirman and suppores of the club your managing.
70. joe bowley | July 29th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

i think that you should be able 2 write to the chairman and ASK for money an he says yes or no because you might need more money asap and so u can put ur tcet prices up and merchandise and expand the stadim plz ps me a private comment if u agree with me
71. Anthony Hughes | July 31st, 2008 at 8:11 pm

ive read through most of the comments and i think that the youth cup idea is brilliant. Get on with it SM plz
72. Ryan Parker | August 1st, 2008 at 9:20 am

i think that all money should stay the same but teams like man u barca n real madrid should have a bit less money coz they have best players on game
73. Mark Stuart | August 4th, 2008 at 8:21 am

I manage Barcelona in my custom setup, but i still only earn 250,000 a week. Whatever i earn in a home game i lose almost all of it in an away game. Gate receipts i understand, but surely you should still earn money from TV revenue and Sponsorship. No club today would excist if they earned such a small amount each week.
74. robert armstrong | August 4th, 2008 at 8:53 am

ive just got promoted and spent a lot of cash getting out of the bottom divion but now ive been promoted i struggleing with players only just better than the last diovion .
so my idea is you can request a number of transfers (e.g 3 players in) and the chairman will give you the money to buy them if you stay up you can keep them go down and you must sell them.
this will probley only work with newly promuted teams or else other clubs get a unfair advatage.
75. doug haggarty | August 4th, 2008 at 6:20 pm

Surely the game is about managing your resources effectively according to the status and income of the team that you manage. If it’s a lower league side, then part of the fun of it is looking for younger, cheaper players that will develop and blending them with more experienced players coming to the end of their careers. If you get promoted, then it’s only realistic that the next season will present a tougher challenge. You just have to tough it out:buy and sell as wisely as you can:hope for a bit of luck and build slowly. Otherwise, where’s the realism? Even with wealthier clubs, there have to be restrictions to create realism and challenge. Sometimes I’ve been frustrated by chairmen blocking deals, but I’m glad they do it because then you have to go back and negotiate - like a real football club. Parameters like these mean that building a team actually brings a sense of having achieved something.
I do, however, have a problem with one aspet of the transfer system. Increasingly, 90+ (or even just 88+) rated players are put on the market with a view to a swap deal. This is the equivalent of a closed shop as only teams with other high rated players to spare can engage in any deal. This means that mid-ranking or unfashionable teams who are on the rise through good management find that the money gained is virtually useless as bigger clubs have stock piled many of the best players and only wish to swap them with each other. This doesn’t reward progress. Furthermore, it isn’t even realistic - in the real world, players change hands for money in the vast majority of cases not other players. Real Madrid aren’t tempting Man Utd by saying “Here’s Gago and Robinho, please give us Cristiano Ronaldo”. They are offering money that Man Utd will then use elsewhere.
76. harry | August 8th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

next season i need 26 million for my bland tansfers but how i plan to get money could only get me in the 18 - 23 million zone one of those ive just brought in i dont wont 7 miillion only next season last season i braught in and sold out to much only put me from 10th to 7th no ive got new sqaud im doing worse even though ive got better players
77. harry | August 8th, 2008 at 3:08 pm

ok 30 million for 1st
2nd 25 million play off winner 20 million and then 19 18 17 for rest 7ther 16 million and so on
8th 15 mill
till 20th get 4 mill
78. harry | August 8th, 2008 at 3:10 pm

shorten transfer ban from 69 days to 30 days
79. Deon | August 11th, 2008 at 4:30 pm

well i am relatively new in this game but i am a constant player
i have a few suggestions which i hope the SM team can consider

1-Youth Cup
i agree with several comments in this sense.Young players seldom get to play in big matchs with key players getting the first 11 slots.The youth cup can also be a way poorer teams earn money.maybe a 5 or 7 a side will be good as not all teams have a youth squad.The reward might be funds for the winning team n the few top places.

2-Sponsor
some SM controlled “companies”should be around in this game.This way teams can have contracts for sponsorship.this will aid both the richer n poorer teams in the sense tat the amount of money u earn depends on the terms u decide on(whcih can be selected from afew preset options).Other than team sponsorship deals thr could also be player sponsorship deals(like in real life)

3-Request for funds
since the chairman is able to stop transfers,the chairman should also be able to raise money provided that the team needs it and the reason for request(again,from afew preset options) is reasonable.

these are the 3 points i feel tat would inprove the game to make it more attractive to others.

hope u will consider the points i list above
80. Deon | August 17th, 2008 at 7:35 pm

one point i left out
currently as i know the SM team is rating players according to their real life ratings,but isit this unfair to teams who are shorter on funds?maybe the system should change so tat ratings are improve according to the playing time the players get(as in during the games)
81. curt | August 20th, 2008 at 11:25 am

i recon the youth team thing is a good idea but bonus for leage and cup positions should reflect real life e.g. teams who come 1st in division 1 should get the same as teams who come 1st in premiership ( real life).
82. ** ### RORY CLYNES ### ** | August 20th, 2008 at 9:52 pm

PLEASE READ!!!!!
i have been reading some comments, someare about little clubs not getting alot of money, thats what happens in reallife, u can’t do anything about that unless, you are a good manager, part of being a good manager is finding a good deal, will the player suit your formation, have u got a sub for him in his position incase of injury. KEEP READING

I have a great idea to help this money situation thou, depending on how rich the chairman is an how you and your chairmans relationship is, you should be able to have a cash injection, BUT not when it suits them, but when you want 1, you should beable to borrow once a season depending on how much he likes what u are doing, (DON’T STOP READING!)
if you have a unhappy face you should not be allowed to borrow any money depending on where u are in the table or jus the transfers you have brought in an how long you have been there, (loyalness) if you have been offered a few chances to manager somone else an declined, it should all add up.
(these are what u get if you had one of these faces)

(unhappy) - NOTHING.

(normal) - A max of 5 million able to borrow.

(okay) - A max of 9 million able to borrow.

(very happy) - A max of 16 million able to borrow

you are only allowed to borrow some money once a season though.

IF YOU LIKE MY IDEA PLEASE WRITE TO ME AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK.
P.S I HOPE SOCCERMANAGER READS THIS, Aston villa manager, second in the table, brilliant team, brilliant game.
THANKS FOR READING.
83. ** ### RORY CLYNES ### ** | August 20th, 2008 at 9:55 pm

PLEASE READ!!!!!
i have been reading some comments, someare about little clubs not getting alot of money, thats what happens in reallife, u can’t do anything about that unless, you are a good manager, part of being a good manager is finding a good deal, will the player suit your formation, have u got a sub for him in his position incase of injury. KEEP READING

I have a great idea to help this money situation thou, depending on how rich the chairman is an how you and your chairmans relationship is, you should be able to have a cash injection, BUT not when it suits them, but when you want 1, you should beable to borrow once a season depending on how much he likes what u are doing, (DON’T STOP READING!)
if you have a unhappy face you should not be allowed to borrow any money depending on where u are in the table or jus the transfers you have brought in an how long you have been there, (loyalness) if you have been offered a few chances to manager somone else an declined, it should all add up.
(these are what u get if you had one of these faces)

(unhappy) - NOTHING.

(normal) - A max of 5 million able to borrow.

(okay) - A max of 9 million able to borrow.

(very happy) - A max of 16 million able to borrow

you are only allowed to borrow some money once a season though.

IF YOU LIKE MY IDEA PLEASE WRITE TO ME AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK.
P.S I HOPE SOCCERMANAGER READS THIS, Aston villa manager, second in the table, brilliant team, brilliant game.
THANKS FOR READING.
84. ** ### RORY CLYNES ### ** | August 20th, 2008 at 9:57 pm

PLEASE READ!!!!!
i have been reading some comments, someare about little clubs not getting alot of money, thats what happens in reallife, u can’t do anything about that unless, you are a good manager, part of being a good manager is finding a good deal, will the player suit your formation, have u got a sub for him in his position incase of injury. KEEP READING

I have a great idea to help this money situation thou, depending on how rich the chairman is an how you and your chairmans relationship is, you should be able to have a cash injection, BUT not when it suits them, but when you want 1, you should beable to borrow once a season depending on how much he likes what u are doing, (DON’T STOP READING!)
if you have a unhappy face you should not be allowed to borrow any money depending on where u are in the table or jus the transfers you have brought in an how long you have been there, (loyalness) if you have been offered a few chances to manager somone else an declined, it should all add up.
(these are what u get if you had one of these faces)

(unhappy) - NOTHING.

(normal) - A max of 5 million able to borrow.

(okay) - A max of 9 million able to borrow.

(very happy) - A max of 16 million able to borrow

you are only allowed to borrow some money once a season though.

IF YOU LIKE MY IDEA PLEASE WRITE TO ME AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK.
P.S I HOPE SOCCERMANAGER READS THIS, Aston villa manager, second in the table, brilliant team, brilliant game.
THANKS FOR READING.
85. ** ### RORY CLYNES ### ** | August 20th, 2008 at 9:58 pm

PLEASE READ!!!!!
i have been reading some comments, someare about little clubs not getting alot of money, thats what happens in reallife, u can’t do anything about that unless, you are a good manager, part of being a good manager is finding a good deal, will the player suit your formation, have u got a sub for him in his position incase of injury. KEEP READING

I have a great idea to help this money situation thou, depending on how rich the chairman is an how you and your chairmans relationship is, you should be able to have a cash injection, BUT not when it suits them, but when you want 1, you should beable to borrow once a season depending on how much he likes what u are doing, (DON’T STOP READING!)
if you have a unhappy face you should not be allowed to borrow any money depending on where u are in the table or jus the transfers you have brought in an how long you have been there, (loyalness) if you have been offered a few chances to manager somone else an declined, it should all add up.
(these are what u get if you had one of these faces)

(unhappy) - NOTHING.

(normal) - A max of 5 million able to borrow.

(okay) - A max of 9 million able to borrow.

(very happy) - A max of 16 million able to borrow

you are only allowed to borrow some money once a season though.

IF YOU LIKE MY IDEA PLEASE WRITE TO ME AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK.
P.S I HOPE SOCCERMANAGER READS THIS, Aston villa manager, second in the table, brilliant team, brilliant game.
THANKS FOR READING.
86. ** ### RORY CLYNES ### ** | August 20th, 2008 at 9:59 pm

PLEASE READ!!!!!
i have been reading some comments, someare about little clubs not getting alot of money, thats what happens in reallife, u can’t do anything about that unless, you are a good manager, part of being a good manager is finding a good deal, will the player suit your formation, have u got a sub for him in his position incase of injury. KEEP READING

I have a great idea to help this money situation thou, depending on how rich the chairman is an how you and your chairmans relationship is, you should be able to have a cash injection, BUT not when it suits them, but when you want 1, you should beable to borrow once a season depending on how much he likes what u are doing, (DON’T STOP READING!)
if you have a unhappy face you should not be allowed to borrow any money depending on where u are in the table or jus the transfers you have brought in an how long you have been there, (loyalness) if you have been offered a few chances to manager somone else an declined, it should all add up.
(these are what u get if you had one of these faces)

(unhappy) - NOTHING.

(normal) - A max of 5 million able to borrow.

(okay) - A max of 9 million able to borrow.

(very happy) - A max of 16 million able to borrow

you are only allowed to borrow some money once a season though.

IF YOU LIKE MY IDEA PLEASE WRITE TO ME AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK.
P.S I HOPE SOCCERMANAGER READS THIS, Aston villa manager, second in the table, brilliant team, brilliant game.
THANKS FOR READING.